Bioethanol Production by Consolidated Bioprocessing and Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation of Sorghum Flour Using Pichia and Meyerozyma guilliermondii Strains

Main Article Content

Aernan Stella Doofan et al

Abstract

The urgent need for renewable energy sources worldwide has heightened due to worries about climate change, energy security, and the limited supply of fossil fuels, necessitating the need for other sustainable substitute such as bioethanol. This study is aimed at applying consolidated bioprocessing (CBP) and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) processes for bioethanol production from sorghum flour using Pichia and Meyerozyma guilliermondii strains. Sorghum grains, purchased from a local market were ground to flour using an industrial grinding machine, while Pichia strains were obtained from a stock culture and M. guilliermondii, isolated from fresh palm wine and characterised. Also, about 1.6kg of corn grains were subjected to malting to produce alpha-amylase. The obtained amylase was partially purified using 80 % ammonium sulphate saturation followed by dialysis yielding a specific activity of 23.22 U/mg and total protein of 0.9098 mg/ml. The partially purified enzyme upon characterization was found to act optimally at a pH of 5.0, temperature of 50 oC with a Km and Vmax values of 0.0024 mM-1 and 2400 U-1 respectively. The obtained enzyme was further employed in CBP and SSF for bioethanol production. The fermentation was carried out for 7 days and fermentation parameters were estimated using appropriate formula. The results showed that SSF of Meyerozyma guilliermondii exhibited maximum bioethanol yield of 0.274g/g with fermentation efficiency of 53.62 % after 4 days of fermentation, while CBP exhibited 0.177g/g of bioethanol with fermentation efficiency of 34.64 % after 2 days. CBP and SSF of Pichia strain Y exhibited 0.192g/g and 0.135g/g bioethanol yield with a 37.57% and 26.42% fermentation efficiency after a day respectively, while CBP of Pichia strain Z exhibited 0.142g/g bioethanol yield with 27.79% fermentation efficiency after 2 days, and SSF exhibited 0.140g/g bioethanol with fermentation efficiency of 27.40% after a day. From the results, M. guilliermondii efficiently utilised sorghum flour for bioethanol production and demonstrated more tolerance to elevated levels of glucose and ethanol when compared to Pichia strains. Effective utilisation of these optimised conditions could play significant roles in efficient use of these organism for industrial production of bioethanol.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Aernan Stella Doofan et al. (2026). Bioethanol Production by Consolidated Bioprocessing and Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation of Sorghum Flour Using Pichia and Meyerozyma guilliermondii Strains. Journal of Biological Research and Biotechnology, 24(1), 421-433. https://doi.org/10.4314/br.v24i1.16
Section
Articles

References

Adewale, I. O., Agumanu, E. N., & Otih-Okoronkwo F. I. (2006). Comparative Studies on α-Amylase from Malted Maize (Zea mays), Millet (Eleusine coracana) and Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). Carbohydrate Polymers, 66(1), 71–74.

Ahuja, V., Arora, A., Chauhan, S., Thakur, S., Jeyaseelan, C., & Paul, D. (2023). Yeast-Mediated Biomass Valorization for Biofuel Production: A Literature Review. Fermentation, 9(784), 1–20.

Antunes, F. A. F., Freitas, J. B. F., Prado, C. A., Castro-Alonso, M. J., Diaz-Ruiz, E., Mera, A. E., Santos, J. C., & da Silva, S. S. (2023). Valorization of Corn Cobs for Xylitol and Bioethanol Production through Column Reactor Process. Energies, 16(4841), 1–15.

Banner, A., Toogood, H. S., & Scrutton, N. S. (2021). Consolidated bioprocessing: Synthetic biology routes to fuels and fine chemicals. Microorganisms, 9, 1079.

Chandrasekhar, T., Varaprasad, D., Gnaneswari, P., Swapna, B., Riazunnisa, K., Anu Prasanna, V., Korivi, M., Wee, Y. J., & Lebaka, V. R. (2023). Algae: The Reservoir of Bioethanol. Fermentation, 9(8), 1–29.

Chilaka, F. C., Eze, S., Anyadiegwu, C., & Uvere, P. O. (2002). Browning in processed yams: peroxidase or polyphenol oxidase?. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 82(8):899-903

Coulibaly, W. H., Mian, T. M.-A. S., Camara, F., Beugré, M. G. A., Diguță, C. F., & Matei, F. (2023). Bioethanol Production Through Saccharomyces and Non-Saccharomyces Yeast Strains Isolated From Cocoa Mucilage Juice Fermented. Scientific Bulletin. Series F. Biotechnologies, 27(1), 139–146.

Dabija, A., Ciocan, M. E., Chetrariu, A., & Codină, G. G. (2021). applied sciences Maize and Sorghum as Raw Materials for Brewing , a Review. Applied Sciences, 11(3139), 1–24.

Derman, E., Abdulla, R., Marbawi, H., Sabullah, M. K., Gansau, J. A., & Ravindra, P. (2022). Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation of Empty Fruit Bunches of Palm for Bioethanol Production Using a Microbial Consortium of S . cerevisiae and T . harzianum. Fermentation, 8(295), 1–27.

Devi, A., Bajar, S., Sihag, P., Sheikh, Z. U. D., Singh, A., Kaur, J., Bishnoi, N. R., & Pant, D. (2023). A panoramic view of technological landscape for bioethanol production from various generations of feedstocks. Bioengineered, 14(1), 81–112.

Fathiah, M. F., Hartono, F. D., Astuti, R. I., Listiyowati, S., & Meryandini, A. (2024). Bioethanol Production from Non-Conventional Yeasts Wickerhamomyces anomalus (Pichia anomala) and Detection of ADH1 Gene Muhammad. Hayati Journal of Biosciences, 31(2), 221–228.

Grijalva-Vallejos, N., Aranda, A., & Matallana, E. (2020). Evaluation of yeasts from Ecuadorian chicha by their performance as starters for alcoholic fermentations in the food industry. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 317, 108462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108462

Hamadou, B., Djomdi, D., Falama, R. Z., Darnan, R. D., Audonnet, F., Fontanille, P., Delattre, C., Pierre, G., Dubessay, P., Michaud, P., & Christophe, G. (2023). Optimization of energy recovery efficiency from sweet sorghum stems by ethanol and methane fermentation processes coupling. Bioengineered, 14(1), 228–244.

Hashem, M., Alamri, S. A., Asseri, T. A. Y., Mostafa, Y. S., Lyberatos, G., & Ntaikou, I. (2021). On the Optimization of Fermentation Conditions for Enhanced Bioethanol Yields from Starchy Biowaste via Yeast Co-Cultures. Sustainability, 13(1890), 1–13.

Hawaz, E., Tafesse, M., Tesfaye, A., Beyene, D., Kiros, S., Kebede, G., Boekhout, T., Theelen, B., Groenewald, M., Degefe, A., Degu, S., Admas, A., & Muleta, D. (2022). Isolation and characterization of bioethanol producing wild yeasts from bio‑wastes and co‑products of sugar factories. Annals of Microbiology, 72(39), 1–16.

Kawa-rygielska, J., & Opiela, E. (2023). Production of gluten-free beer brewing from sorghum malts mashed without external enzyme preparations. Journal of Cereal Science, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2023.103693

Kechkar, M., Sayed, W., Cabrol, A., Aziza, M., Zaid, T. A., Amrane, A., & Djelal, H. (2019). Isolation and Identification of Yeast Strains from Sugarcane Molasses, Dates and Figs for Ethanol Production Under Conditions Simulationg Agal Hydrolysate. Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 36(01), 157–169.

Li, J., Zhao, R., Xu, Y., Wu, X., Bean, S. R., & Wang, D. (2022). Fuel ethanol production from starchy grain and other crops: An overview on feedstocks, affecting factors, and technical advances. Renewable Energy, 188, 223–239.

Liu, L., Yang, J., Yang, Y., Luo, L., Wang, R., Zhang, Y., & Yuan, H. (2019). Bioresource Technology Consolidated bioprocessing performance of bacterial consortium EMSD5 on hemicellulose for isopropanol production. Bioresource Technology, 292(2), 121965.

Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L., & Randall, R. J. (1951). Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 193(1), 265–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(19)52451-6

Malherbe, S. J. M., Cripwell, R. A., Favaro, L., Van Zyl, W. H., & Viljoen-bloom, M. (2023). Triticale and sorghum as feedstock for bioethanol production via consolidated bioprocessing. Renewable Energy, 206, 498–505.

Manikandan, K., Rengadurai, S., Babu, E., & Sothivanan, S. (2022). Optimization Studies in Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation of Wheat Bran Flour into Ethanol. Food and Nutrition Sciences, 13, 463–470.

Miller, G. L. (1959). Use of DinitrosaIicyIic Acid Reagent for Determination of Reducing Sugar. Analytical Chemistry, 31(3), 426–428.

Ochaikul, D., Jongmeesuk, A., & Maneeruttanarungroj, C. (2019). Bioethanol Fermentation from Acid/Base-Treated Water Hyacinth Biomass using Fermentation Yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae YRK 017 and Candida Shehatae ATCC 22984. International Journal of Renewable Energy Research, 9(3), 1–7.

Ofoedu, C. E., Okafor, D. C., Iwouno, J. O., & Ojimba, N. C. (2022). Original article effect of malting regimen on diastatic power, cold and hot water extracts of malts from sorghum. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.15759

Oyeleke, S. B., & Jibrin, N. M. (2009). Production of bioethanol from guinea corn husk and millet husk. African Journal of Microbiology Research, 3(4), 147–152.

Rabah, A. B., Oyeleke, S. B., Manga, S. B., & Hassan, L. G. (2020). Utilization of millet and guinea corn husks for bioethanol production. African Journal of Botany, 8(4), 1–4.

Raharja, R., Murdiyatmo, U., Sutrisno, A., & Wardani, A. K. (2019). Bioethanol production from sugarcane molasses by instant dry yeast. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 230(012076), 1–9.

Ramos, M. D. N., Sandri, J. P., Claes, A., Carvalho, B. T., Thevelein, J. M., Zangirolami, T. C., & Milessi, T. S. (2023). Effective application of immobilized second generation industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain on consolidated bioprocessing. In New Biotechnology (Vol. 78, pp. 153–161).

Sandalli, C., Saral, A., Ülker, S., Karaoğlu, H., Beldüz, A. O., & Çiçek, A. Ç. (2014). Cloning, expression, and characterization of a novel CTP synthase gene from Anoxybacillus gonensis G2. Turkish Journal of Biology, 38(1), 111-117.

Simpson, C., Jordaan, J., Gardiner, N. S., & Whiteley, C. (2006). Isolation, purification, and characterization of a novel glucose oxidase from Penicillium sp. CBS 120262 optimally active at neutral pH. Protein Exprimental Purification, 51, 260–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pep.2006.09.013.

Tamura K., Stecher, G., & Kumar, S. (2021). MEGA 11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analyser Version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol., 38(7), 3022-3027.

Wang, G., Michailides, T. J., & Bostock, R. M. (1997). Improved detection of polygalacturonase activity due to mucor piriformis with a modified dinitrosalicylic acid reagent. Phytopathology, 87(2), 161–163.

Yaverino-Gutiérrez, M. A., Wong, A. Y. C.-H., Ibarra-Muñoz, L. A., Chávez, A. C. F., Sosa-Martínez, J. D., Tagle-Pedroza, A. S., Hernández-Beltran, J. U., Sánchez-Muñoz, S., Santos, J. C. dos, Silvério da Silva, S., & Balagurusamy, N. (2024). Perspectives and Progress in Bioethanol Processing and Social Economic Impacts. Sustainability, 16(608), 1–31.

Zheng, J., Negi, A., Khomlaem, C., & Kim, B. S. (2019). Comparison of Bioethanol Production by Candida molischiana and Saccharomyces cerevisiae from Glucose, Cellobiose, and Cellulose. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 29(6), 905–912.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.